Leap Year’s Impact on Compliance Requirements in 2024
Jan 29, 2024
Leap Year’s Impact on Compliance Requirements in 2024

In 2024, leap day will occur on Thursday, Feb. 29. A leap year can create administrative and compliance challenges for organizations every four years. For example, a leap year can impact payroll processing or tax reporting obligations by adding an extra payday to the year. This can increase the number of pay periods from 26 to 27 for employees paid biweekly or from 52 to 53 for employees paid weekly, potentially altering how employees are paid. As a result, it’s essential that employers understand their compliance obligations and assess how an extra day in 2024 may impact any compliance requirements and deadlines.


This article explores how the 2024 leap year can impact compliance deadlines and how employers can proactively prepare and navigate any potential changes. However, the compliance considerations presented in this article are only examples. Employers should consult with their legal counsel to address any specific issues.


Payroll Considerations

Adding an extra day in February 2024 can create an additional pay period for employees who are paid on a weekly or biweekly basis. In 2024, there will be 53 Mondays and 53 Tuesdays. Therefore, weekly or biweekly salaried employees paid on either of these days will have an extra pay period. However, salaried employees paid monthly or semimonthly and employees paid hourly will not be impacted.


When faced with an extra pay period, most employers decide not to change how they pay employees each pay period despite the additional cost. As a result, impacted employees receive an additional pay period for the year, resulting in slightly higher salaries. Other organizations may opt to change their pay frequency or date to account for a leap year.


Some employers may decide to keep employees’ total annual salary the same but spread it out over the entire year. Employers can do this by counting the number of pay periods that will occur during the year and adjusting employee paychecks to account for an extra pay period. However, because of the extra pay period, employees would receive slightly less each paycheck, even though their total annual salary will remain the same. This can create confusion or negatively impact employees unless employers explain ahead of time why workers will receive slightly less each pay period, allowing employees time to prepare. Additionally, employers can explain that an extra pay period may impact employee deductions for benefits and contributions to retirement or health savings plans.


IRS tax withholding requirements do not change when there’s an additional pay period during the year. Therefore, employers must adjust their withholding calculations to ensure they withhold sufficient federal, state and local income taxes. To help avoid errors and ensure accurate payroll calculations, employers can review their payroll systems to ensure they can address leap-year payroll correctly. This can include accounting for an additional pay period, if applicable; withholding taxes correctly; and reviewing pay dates so employees are paid on time. Organizations can also prepare for an additional pay period by ensuring proper budgeting and cash flow to avoid any issues.


Benefits Considerations

Health plan deductions are typically determined by the number of pay periods. As a result, a leap year may force employers to recalculate health plan deductions. Additionally, a leap year can impact employee contributions to 401(k)s, health savings accounts and flexible savings accounts, requiring employees to adjust how much is deducted from each paycheck to ensure they contribute the maximum amount by the end of the year. Therefore, it’s important employers communicate how a leap year may impact employee contributions and allow employees sufficient time to adjust.


The IRS recently finalized reporting regulations under the Affordable Care Act that established a permanent 30-day automatic extension from Jan. 31 for employers to furnish Form 1095-C to employees. According to IRS guidance, applicable large employers must furnish Forms 1095-C to their employees no later than March 2. However, because of the 2024 leap year, the deadline this year is March 1, 2024.


Moreover, the Medicare Modernization Act requires organizations whose health care policies include Medicare prescription drug coverage to notify Medicare-eligible policyholders whether their prescription drug coverage is creditable. These entities must report the credible coverage status of their prescription drug plan to the Centers for Medicare (CMS) no later than 60 days from the beginning of a plan year. If a plan year starts at the beginning of the year, employers typically have until March 1 to report to the CMS. In 2024, however, the reporting must be done by Feb. 29.


Employer Compliance Considerations

The 2024 leap year may also impact certain employer compliance requirements. Employers should review their compliance obligations to ensure they avoid any potential violations.


While many laws are silent on the impact of a leap year, employer obligations are not altered. For example, the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which establishes minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping and youth employment standards, does not specifically address leap-year considerations. However, since a leap year can create 27 or 53 pay periods (rather than 26 and 52), an employee’s weekly salary may drop below the federal or state-exempt salary threshold in certain circumstances. If this occurs, that employee would lose their FLSA exempt status, which could result in wage and hour violations if not properly addressed. Calculating any pay period adjustments at the start of the year can help employers prepare and avoid potential FLSA overtime and meal and rest break violations that may occur if employees lose their FLSA exempt status due to the additional pay period.


Additionally, employers can review offer letters and other compensation-related documents, including collective bargaining agreements, to determine how best to account for any extra pay periods. In some instances, these documents may state how frequently employees must be paid (e.g., weekly, biweekly). Reviewing these documents can help organizations comply with their legal obligations when determining how to adjust employee compensation during a leap year.


Summary

The additional day in 2024 may present various administrative and compliance challenges for some organizations. Understanding how a leap year impacts compliance requirements can enable employers to prepare and help them avoid costly mistakes. By taking a proactive approach and reassessing timelines, employers can help ensure they meet any compliance requirements and mitigate any potential legal risks.



Contact us today for more workplace guidance.

Sign up for our newsletter.

30 Apr, 2024
On April 23, 2024, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced a final rule to amend current requirements employees in white-collar occupations must satisfy to qualify for an overtime exemption under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The final rule will take effect on July 1, 2024. Increased Salary Level The FLSA white-collar exemptions apply to individuals in executive, administrative, professional, and some outside sales and computer-related occupations. Some highly compensated employees may also qualify for the FLSA white-collar overtime exemption. To qualify for this exemption, white-collar employees must satisfy the standard salary level test, among other criteria. This salary level is a wage threshold that white-collar employees must receive to qualify for the exemption. Starting July 1, 2024, the DOL’s final rule increases the standard salary level from: $684 to $844 per week ($35,568 to $43,888 per year); and $107,432 to $132,964 per year for highly compensated employees. On Jan. 1, 2025, the standard salary level will then increase from: $844 to $1,128 per week ($43,888 to $58,656 per year); and $132,964 to $151,164 per year for highly compensated employees. Automatic Updates The DOL’s final rule also includes mechanisms allowing the agency to automatically update the white-collar salary level thresholds without having to rely on the rulemaking process. Effective July 1, 2027, and every three years thereafter, the DOL will increase the standard salary level. The agency will apply up-to-date wage data to determine new salary levels. Impact on Employers The first salary level increase in July is expected to impact nearly 1 million workers, while the second increase in January is expected to affect approximately 3 million workers. Employers should become familiar with the final rule and evaluate what changes they may need to adopt to comply with the rule’s requirements. Legal challenges to the rule are anticipated, which may delay the final rule’s implementation.
29 Apr, 2024
The recently enacted New York budget for fiscal year 2024-25 includes provisions mandating paid prenatal leave for the state’s workers, beginning Jan. 1, 2025, and repealing the New York COVID-19 sick leave law, effective July 31, 2025. Paid Prenatal Personal Leave The budget amends the state sick leave law by adding what is being touted as a first-in-the-nation requirement that all employers provide their employees with 20 hours of paid prenatal personal leave per 52-week period, starting Jan. 1, 2025. The amendment does not require employees to accrue the new leave, nor does it impose a waiting period before employees may use the leave; the full 20 hours must be made available on Jan. 1, 2025. Employees on leave must be paid their regular rate of pay or minimum wage if the applicable minimum wage is higher; however, employers are not required to pay out unused prenatal personal leave when an employee separates from employment. Permitted Uses of Prenatal Personal Leave Prenatal personal leave may be taken for health care services received by an employee during their pregnancy or related to the pregnancy, including physical examinations, medical procedures, monitoring and testing, and discussions with a health care provider related to the pregnancy. The new provisions do not require advance notification or documentation after the fact for using leave. Interaction With Paid Sick Leave and FMLA Leave The new requirement is in addition to the annual sick leave the law already mandates, which ranges from 40-56 hours and may be paid or unpaid, depending on the employer’s size and income. The amendment does not indicate that the leave runs concurrently with any federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) leave taken for prenatal care, meaning the state prenatal personal leave would be in addition to any FMLA leave taken for this purpose. Sunset Date for COVID-19 Leave The budget also establishes July 31, 2025, as the expiration date for New York’s COVID-19 employee sick leave law . The law took effect at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, on March 18, 2020, and requires leave of up to 14 days, depending on the size and income of the employer. As with the regular sick leave law, whether leave must be paid also depends on the size and income of the employer. The sunsetting of the law comes in the wake of expired states of emergency and changed recommendations for isolation and quarantine. Steps for Employers New York employers should prepare for the start of paid prenatal personal leave in January 2025 and watch for any agency regulations and guidance implementing the new leave entitlement. Employers should also train managers and supervisors about the new requirements and make sure employee policies and handbooks are up to date. Employers should continue to allow COVID-19 sick leave when it applies and keep in mind that other leave requirements, such as paid sick leave, may allow employees to take time off from work for illness, including COVID-19.
25 Apr, 2024
On April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) voted to issue a final rule that would ban noncompete agreements in virtually all employment relationships. The final rule has not yet been filed in the Federal Register, but is scheduled to take effect 120 days after such filing. Final Rule The final rule defines a noncompete clause as a term or condition of employment that prohibits a worker from, penalizes a worker for or functions to prevent a worker from: (i) Seeking or accepting work in the United States with a different person where such work would begin after the conclusion of the employment that includes the term or condition; or (ii) Operating a business in the United States after the conclusion of the employment that includes the term or condition. Such terms or conditions include employee contracts or workplace policies, whether written or oral. Subject to very limited exceptions, the final rule provides that: The use of noncompete clauses will be banned as of the effective date; Any existing noncompete clauses (other than those entered into with senior executives) will be invalidated; Employers must notify all employees (other than senior executives whose existing noncompete agreements will remain enforceable) that their existing noncompete agreements will not be enforced. Currently, the enforceability of noncompete clauses is determined by state and local legislatures and courts. The FTC rule would instead govern the enforceability of noncompete clauses at the federal level and supersede any less restrictive state laws or judicial interpretations. Legal Challenges On April 24, 2024, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce sued the FTC, seeking to block the final rule. The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and argues that the FTC lacks the authority to issue rules that define unfair methods of competition. Additional legal challenges are likely, so employers should monitor for updates and anticipate potential uncertainty in the coming months. Next Steps for Employers Employers may consider reviewing existing employee agreements or form agreements (such as new hire paperwork) to determine whether any contain noncompete clauses that would be invalidated under the rule. Employers may also begin preparing revisions to such agreements and consider whether to use alternatives to noncompete clauses (e.g., nondisclosure clauses) to protect competitive business information.

Have a question? Get in touch.

Share by: