Understanding Pooled Employer Plans (PEPs)
Dec 13, 2023
Unlocking the Benefits: Understanding Pooled Employer Plans (PEPs)

Pooled Employer Plans (PEPs) have emerged as a game-changer in the retirement savings landscape, offering businesses and employees a streamlined and cost-effective approach to retirement planning. This article aims to demystify the concept of PEPs, exploring their structure, advantages, and the potential impact they can have on the retirement readiness of employees.


What is a Pooled Employer Plan?

A Pooled Employer Plan is a type of retirement savings arrangement established by the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) Act in 2019. The SECURE Act introduced PEPs to encourage more small and medium-sized businesses to offer retirement benefits to their employees. PEPs enable unrelated employers to join a single retirement plan, sharing the administrative and fiduciary responsibilities, which can lead to significant cost savings.


Key Features

  1. Multiple Employers, One Plan: PEPs allow unrelated employers to participate in a single retirement plan. This consolidation of resources is designed to make retirement benefits more accessible to a broader range of businesses.
  2. Administrative Efficiencies: By pooling resources, employers in a PEP can achieve economies of scale. This means shared administrative costs and responsibilities, reducing the burden on individual businesses and potentially lowering overall plan costs.
  3. Fiduciary Oversight: A PEP typically designates a pooled plan provider, responsible for assuming the role of the named fiduciary. This provider takes on certain administrative and fiduciary responsibilities, relieving employers of some of the legal obligations associated with offering a retirement plan.


Benefits for Employers

  1. Cost Savings: PEPs offer the advantage of reduced administrative and operational costs. Sharing these expenses among multiple employers can result in considerable savings compared to maintaining individual retirement plans.
  2. Reduced Administrative Burden: Employers participating in a PEP can offload much of the day-to-day administrative tasks to the pooled plan provider. This allows businesses to focus on their core operations while ensuring employees receive valuable retirement benefits.
  3. Access to Expertise: PEPs are often managed by experienced professionals, providing a level of expertise that might be challenging for individual small businesses to secure. This can enhance the overall quality of the retirement plan.


Benefits for Employees

  1. Enhanced Investment Options: PEPs, with their larger asset pools, may offer a more diverse range of investment options for participants. This can empower employees to tailor their investment strategy based on their individual preferences and risk tolerance.
  2. Increased Portability: As employees move between employers participating in the same PEP, they can maintain continuity in their retirement savings. This portability is especially beneficial in today's dynamic job market.
  3. Simplified Decision-Making: With the administrative aspects managed by the pooled plan provider, employees can enjoy a simplified and user-friendly experience when it comes to enrolling, managing contributions, and accessing information about their retirement plan.


PEPs versus Traditional 401(k)/403(b)

Compared to traditional 401(k) or 403(b) plans, PEPs offer a distinct advantage by consolidating administrative tasks. Traditional plans for individual employers often come with higher administrative burdens and costs, making them less feasible for smaller businesses. PEPs, with their shared responsibilities and reduced costs, level the playing field, allowing a broader spectrum of businesses to provide robust retirement benefits.


Another notable difference lies in fiduciary responsibilities. In a PEP, a pooled plan provider assumes many fiduciary duties, alleviating individual employers from some of the legal obligations associated with managing a retirement plan. This shift in responsibility can be particularly advantageous for businesses with limited resources or expertise in retirement plan administration.


In essence, while traditional plans continue to be a staple in the retirement benefits landscape, PEPs introduce a modern, collaborative approach that addresses the evolving needs of both employers and employees. The decision between a PEP and a traditional plan hinges on the specific requirements and circumstances of each employer, emphasizing the importance of a tailored approach to retirement planning.


Contact Simco today for more information.

Sign up for our newsletter.

30 Apr, 2024
On April 23, 2024, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced a final rule to amend current requirements employees in white-collar occupations must satisfy to qualify for an overtime exemption under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The final rule will take effect on July 1, 2024. Increased Salary Level The FLSA white-collar exemptions apply to individuals in executive, administrative, professional, and some outside sales and computer-related occupations. Some highly compensated employees may also qualify for the FLSA white-collar overtime exemption. To qualify for this exemption, white-collar employees must satisfy the standard salary level test, among other criteria. This salary level is a wage threshold that white-collar employees must receive to qualify for the exemption. Starting July 1, 2024, the DOL’s final rule increases the standard salary level from: $684 to $844 per week ($35,568 to $43,888 per year); and $107,432 to $132,964 per year for highly compensated employees. On Jan. 1, 2025, the standard salary level will then increase from: $844 to $1,128 per week ($43,888 to $58,656 per year); and $132,964 to $151,164 per year for highly compensated employees. Automatic Updates The DOL’s final rule also includes mechanisms allowing the agency to automatically update the white-collar salary level thresholds without having to rely on the rulemaking process. Effective July 1, 2027, and every three years thereafter, the DOL will increase the standard salary level. The agency will apply up-to-date wage data to determine new salary levels. Impact on Employers The first salary level increase in July is expected to impact nearly 1 million workers, while the second increase in January is expected to affect approximately 3 million workers. Employers should become familiar with the final rule and evaluate what changes they may need to adopt to comply with the rule’s requirements. Legal challenges to the rule are anticipated, which may delay the final rule’s implementation.
29 Apr, 2024
The recently enacted New York budget for fiscal year 2024-25 includes provisions mandating paid prenatal leave for the state’s workers, beginning Jan. 1, 2025, and repealing the New York COVID-19 sick leave law, effective July 31, 2025. Paid Prenatal Personal Leave The budget amends the state sick leave law by adding what is being touted as a first-in-the-nation requirement that all employers provide their employees with 20 hours of paid prenatal personal leave per 52-week period, starting Jan. 1, 2025. The amendment does not require employees to accrue the new leave, nor does it impose a waiting period before employees may use the leave; the full 20 hours must be made available on Jan. 1, 2025. Employees on leave must be paid their regular rate of pay or minimum wage if the applicable minimum wage is higher; however, employers are not required to pay out unused prenatal personal leave when an employee separates from employment. Permitted Uses of Prenatal Personal Leave Prenatal personal leave may be taken for health care services received by an employee during their pregnancy or related to the pregnancy, including physical examinations, medical procedures, monitoring and testing, and discussions with a health care provider related to the pregnancy. The new provisions do not require advance notification or documentation after the fact for using leave. Interaction With Paid Sick Leave and FMLA Leave The new requirement is in addition to the annual sick leave the law already mandates, which ranges from 40-56 hours and may be paid or unpaid, depending on the employer’s size and income. The amendment does not indicate that the leave runs concurrently with any federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) leave taken for prenatal care, meaning the state prenatal personal leave would be in addition to any FMLA leave taken for this purpose. Sunset Date for COVID-19 Leave The budget also establishes July 31, 2025, as the expiration date for New York’s COVID-19 employee sick leave law . The law took effect at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, on March 18, 2020, and requires leave of up to 14 days, depending on the size and income of the employer. As with the regular sick leave law, whether leave must be paid also depends on the size and income of the employer. The sunsetting of the law comes in the wake of expired states of emergency and changed recommendations for isolation and quarantine. Steps for Employers New York employers should prepare for the start of paid prenatal personal leave in January 2025 and watch for any agency regulations and guidance implementing the new leave entitlement. Employers should also train managers and supervisors about the new requirements and make sure employee policies and handbooks are up to date. Employers should continue to allow COVID-19 sick leave when it applies and keep in mind that other leave requirements, such as paid sick leave, may allow employees to take time off from work for illness, including COVID-19.
25 Apr, 2024
On April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) voted to issue a final rule that would ban noncompete agreements in virtually all employment relationships. The final rule has not yet been filed in the Federal Register, but is scheduled to take effect 120 days after such filing. Final Rule The final rule defines a noncompete clause as a term or condition of employment that prohibits a worker from, penalizes a worker for or functions to prevent a worker from: (i) Seeking or accepting work in the United States with a different person where such work would begin after the conclusion of the employment that includes the term or condition; or (ii) Operating a business in the United States after the conclusion of the employment that includes the term or condition. Such terms or conditions include employee contracts or workplace policies, whether written or oral. Subject to very limited exceptions, the final rule provides that: The use of noncompete clauses will be banned as of the effective date; Any existing noncompete clauses (other than those entered into with senior executives) will be invalidated; Employers must notify all employees (other than senior executives whose existing noncompete agreements will remain enforceable) that their existing noncompete agreements will not be enforced. Currently, the enforceability of noncompete clauses is determined by state and local legislatures and courts. The FTC rule would instead govern the enforceability of noncompete clauses at the federal level and supersede any less restrictive state laws or judicial interpretations. Legal Challenges On April 24, 2024, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce sued the FTC, seeking to block the final rule. The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and argues that the FTC lacks the authority to issue rules that define unfair methods of competition. Additional legal challenges are likely, so employers should monitor for updates and anticipate potential uncertainty in the coming months. Next Steps for Employers Employers may consider reviewing existing employee agreements or form agreements (such as new hire paperwork) to determine whether any contain noncompete clauses that would be invalidated under the rule. Employers may also begin preparing revisions to such agreements and consider whether to use alternatives to noncompete clauses (e.g., nondisclosure clauses) to protect competitive business information.

Have a question? Get in touch.

Share by: