Enhancing Employee Learning and Development With Learning Management Systems
Oct 26, 2023
Enhancing Employee Learning and Development With Learning Management Systems

A recent survey by management consulting company Gallup found that nearly three-quarters of the U.S. workforce are not engaged. Learning and development (L&D) opportunities provide employees with a purpose, encourage community and foster curiosity, all of which can contribute to increased employee engagement. Furthermore, these programs show employees their development is valued, which can boost morale and improve attraction and retention. In fact, educational technology company LinkedIn Learning found that three of the top five reasons employees search for new jobs relate to their desire to learn, grow and develop new skills.


Successful L&D programs can also help employers reduce skills gaps and drive operational excellence. Yet, traditional learning opportunities aren’t always compatible with a modern workforce. For example, employers with a multi-generational workforce, a significant number of remote or semi-remote employees, or employees with a wide range of learning styles may find that conventional learning practices create unequal growth and learning opportunities within an organization. Therefore, finding an effective means for online training, such as a learning management system (LMS), is a critical aspect of many L&D programs.


This article explains how LMSs can be used to further L&D programs and outlines potential benefits and drawbacks.


LMS Overview

An LMS is a software application or web-based technology employers can use to plan, design, implement and evaluate their L&D programs. They’re often used to store e-learning content and automate employee learning processes. LMSs can have basic functionality or be highly advanced technology that can gamify learning, advance social and mobile learning, and use artificial intelligence. The following are common functions of LMSs:


  • Oversee training and e-learning
  • Store, organize and distribute courses
  • Track individual progress
  • Set employee goals
  • Communicate with individuals
  • Provide detailed analyses
  • Identify skills gaps
  • Indicate individuals in need of additional support


Benefits of Using LMSs

LMSs can benefit organizations that want to provide self-paced learning opportunities or have a widely dispersed workforce. They can help organizations evolve, accelerate growth and address talent shortages.


Using an LMS for L&D programs may be advantageous, as it may achieve the following:


  • Reduce cost. Over the long term, e-learning can be a cost-effective learning solution. With LMSs, employers don’t need to pay for travel, instructors, vendors or other materials (e.g., training manuals), which can reduce total training costs.
  • Save time. These systems allow employers to build complete courses quickly. These courses can continually reused and revised, reducing the time needed to onboard or retrain employees. Furthermore, LMSs lessen the administrative burden by automating much of the learning process. They also allow employees the opportunity for self-paced learning, which can reduce the amount of time employees spend away from work training.
  • Promote a learning culture. Giving employees a tool for continual and self-driven learning with LMSs can enable employers to create a culture of growth and learning. This can benefit both employers and employees by providing individuals with access to updated training and upskilling programs that can reduce skills gaps within an organization. LMSs also allow organizations to understand how effective their training programs are by measuring learning outcomes and connecting them to organizational performance.
  • Ensure compliance. Many organizations are required to provide employees with certain mandatory training (e.g., anti-harassment or health and safety training). LMSs track and store information proving that employees took and understood the required training. This can benefit employers in case of an audit or accident.
  • Boost engagement. Employers can create innovative and meaningful content to boost employee interest and engagement in L&D. Many LMSs allow for gamification, in which employees can unlock higher skill levels by gaining certain features, such as trophies and badges. This can motivate employees to reach new levels of learning and achievement, increasing engagement and improving the user experience.
  • Provide flexible learning. LMSs can easily be scaled up or down to meet the needs of an organization. Employers may choose from a wide variety of learning formats, including videos, webinars and e-learning modules. Personalized learning paths can also be created to meet individual needs, providing employees with an effective learning experience suited for them.  
  • Increase accessibility. Using an online learning system can help employers provide all employees with equal access to onboarding and learning opportunities. This can help ensure that employees won’t be held back from professional growth due to location, schedule availability or learning styles.  

Drawbacks of LMSs

As a software system, an LMS may not be right for every organization. Before purchasing an LMS, employers should consider the following potential disadvantages:


  • Set-up timeThere is a significant upfront time commitment to implementing an LMS. After researching different LMS options, employers must learn how to create courses and implement the system, which may require administrators to undergo system training before launching the course. Additionally, coding and IT knowledge may be required to customize the courses.
  • User-friendliness—Employees who aren’t tech-savvy may initially struggle to adapt to online learning. As a result, it may take more time for some individuals to adapt to the new technology. Employers can help by selecting LMSs with simple and engaging features to improve employee engagement and use.
  • Associated costs—Although LMSs are generally a cost-effective learning solution, there are necessary expenditures, such as purchase fees and implementation, training, security and maintenance costs. These can quickly exceed an employer’s L&D budget. Employers may also find that they must hire additional third-party platforms to boost compatibility and functionality.
  • Limited options for personalized learning—The ability to individualize learning to meet employee needs is a crucial benefit of LMSs. However, some LMSs may provide limited opportunities for personalization, which can make employee learning and engagement less effective.
  • User issues—If LMS support fails to meet the needs of an organization, it can dramatically impact the functionality of an LMS and cause decreased employee engagement. For example, if an LMS only provides basic tutorial information, administrators and users may struggle with the functionality of courses. Furthermore, e-learning may not be right for all learning styles or all types of training (e.g., physical skills). It also lacks human connection, which some individuals may need or desire for optimal learning.
  • Lack of enforceability—Unlike in-person training, which is easy to enforce, LMSs require employees to be self-disciplined and follow through with their training with minimal oversight. As a result, employees may fail to complete essential training. They may also be able to cheat their way through LMS courses, which can undermine the effectiveness of L&D programs. 


Conclusion

Employee L&D is a long-term investment that can contribute to organizational success by lowering turnover, reducing skills gaps and improving employee satisfaction. As organizations navigate the diverse needs of a modern workforce, learning technology such as LMSs may help ensure that all employees have equal access to L&D opportunities.


Contact us today for more workplace resources.

Sign up for our newsletter.

30 Apr, 2024
On April 23, 2024, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced a final rule to amend current requirements employees in white-collar occupations must satisfy to qualify for an overtime exemption under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The final rule will take effect on July 1, 2024. Increased Salary Level The FLSA white-collar exemptions apply to individuals in executive, administrative, professional, and some outside sales and computer-related occupations. Some highly compensated employees may also qualify for the FLSA white-collar overtime exemption. To qualify for this exemption, white-collar employees must satisfy the standard salary level test, among other criteria. This salary level is a wage threshold that white-collar employees must receive to qualify for the exemption. Starting July 1, 2024, the DOL’s final rule increases the standard salary level from: $684 to $844 per week ($35,568 to $43,888 per year); and $107,432 to $132,964 per year for highly compensated employees. On Jan. 1, 2025, the standard salary level will then increase from: $844 to $1,128 per week ($43,888 to $58,656 per year); and $132,964 to $151,164 per year for highly compensated employees. Automatic Updates The DOL’s final rule also includes mechanisms allowing the agency to automatically update the white-collar salary level thresholds without having to rely on the rulemaking process. Effective July 1, 2027, and every three years thereafter, the DOL will increase the standard salary level. The agency will apply up-to-date wage data to determine new salary levels. Impact on Employers The first salary level increase in July is expected to impact nearly 1 million workers, while the second increase in January is expected to affect approximately 3 million workers. Employers should become familiar with the final rule and evaluate what changes they may need to adopt to comply with the rule’s requirements. Legal challenges to the rule are anticipated, which may delay the final rule’s implementation.
29 Apr, 2024
The recently enacted New York budget for fiscal year 2024-25 includes provisions mandating paid prenatal leave for the state’s workers, beginning Jan. 1, 2025, and repealing the New York COVID-19 sick leave law, effective July 31, 2025. Paid Prenatal Personal Leave The budget amends the state sick leave law by adding what is being touted as a first-in-the-nation requirement that all employers provide their employees with 20 hours of paid prenatal personal leave per 52-week period, starting Jan. 1, 2025. The amendment does not require employees to accrue the new leave, nor does it impose a waiting period before employees may use the leave; the full 20 hours must be made available on Jan. 1, 2025. Employees on leave must be paid their regular rate of pay or minimum wage if the applicable minimum wage is higher; however, employers are not required to pay out unused prenatal personal leave when an employee separates from employment. Permitted Uses of Prenatal Personal Leave Prenatal personal leave may be taken for health care services received by an employee during their pregnancy or related to the pregnancy, including physical examinations, medical procedures, monitoring and testing, and discussions with a health care provider related to the pregnancy. The new provisions do not require advance notification or documentation after the fact for using leave. Interaction With Paid Sick Leave and FMLA Leave The new requirement is in addition to the annual sick leave the law already mandates, which ranges from 40-56 hours and may be paid or unpaid, depending on the employer’s size and income. The amendment does not indicate that the leave runs concurrently with any federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) leave taken for prenatal care, meaning the state prenatal personal leave would be in addition to any FMLA leave taken for this purpose. Sunset Date for COVID-19 Leave The budget also establishes July 31, 2025, as the expiration date for New York’s COVID-19 employee sick leave law . The law took effect at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, on March 18, 2020, and requires leave of up to 14 days, depending on the size and income of the employer. As with the regular sick leave law, whether leave must be paid also depends on the size and income of the employer. The sunsetting of the law comes in the wake of expired states of emergency and changed recommendations for isolation and quarantine. Steps for Employers New York employers should prepare for the start of paid prenatal personal leave in January 2025 and watch for any agency regulations and guidance implementing the new leave entitlement. Employers should also train managers and supervisors about the new requirements and make sure employee policies and handbooks are up to date. Employers should continue to allow COVID-19 sick leave when it applies and keep in mind that other leave requirements, such as paid sick leave, may allow employees to take time off from work for illness, including COVID-19.
25 Apr, 2024
On April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) voted to issue a final rule that would ban noncompete agreements in virtually all employment relationships. The final rule has not yet been filed in the Federal Register, but is scheduled to take effect 120 days after such filing. Final Rule The final rule defines a noncompete clause as a term or condition of employment that prohibits a worker from, penalizes a worker for or functions to prevent a worker from: (i) Seeking or accepting work in the United States with a different person where such work would begin after the conclusion of the employment that includes the term or condition; or (ii) Operating a business in the United States after the conclusion of the employment that includes the term or condition. Such terms or conditions include employee contracts or workplace policies, whether written or oral. Subject to very limited exceptions, the final rule provides that: The use of noncompete clauses will be banned as of the effective date; Any existing noncompete clauses (other than those entered into with senior executives) will be invalidated; Employers must notify all employees (other than senior executives whose existing noncompete agreements will remain enforceable) that their existing noncompete agreements will not be enforced. Currently, the enforceability of noncompete clauses is determined by state and local legislatures and courts. The FTC rule would instead govern the enforceability of noncompete clauses at the federal level and supersede any less restrictive state laws or judicial interpretations. Legal Challenges On April 24, 2024, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce sued the FTC, seeking to block the final rule. The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and argues that the FTC lacks the authority to issue rules that define unfair methods of competition. Additional legal challenges are likely, so employers should monitor for updates and anticipate potential uncertainty in the coming months. Next Steps for Employers Employers may consider reviewing existing employee agreements or form agreements (such as new hire paperwork) to determine whether any contain noncompete clauses that would be invalidated under the rule. Employers may also begin preparing revisions to such agreements and consider whether to use alternatives to noncompete clauses (e.g., nondisclosure clauses) to protect competitive business information.

Have a question? Get in touch.

Share by: